<div dir="ltr">Wait, what? This seems to conflict with everything I've ever read. Don't you need TWO eyes to be alive (aside from seki)?</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 8:10 AM, Robert Jasiek <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jasiek@snafu.de" target="_blank">jasiek@snafu.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On 24.10.2014 17:05, Peter Drake wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I believe A is an eye even though the stones to which it is adjacent are<br>
not alive.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></span>
If they are not alive, then A is PART of an eye(space) of the opponent, unless we have an anti-seki.<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
-- <br>
robert jasiek<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
Computer-go mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Computer-go@dvandva.org" target="_blank">Computer-go@dvandva.org</a><br>
<a href="http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go" target="_blank">http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/<u></u>mailman/listinfo/computer-go</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>Peter Drake<br><a href="https://sites.google.com/a/lclark.edu/drake/" target="_blank">https://sites.google.com/a/lclark.edu/drake/</a><br>
</div>