# [Computer-go] Komi and the value of the first move

Jean-loup Gailly jloup at gailly.net
Mon Apr 5 15:25:25 PDT 2010

```> the value of the first move has to be twice the value of the Komi

Here is a proof that I already posted in this list (slightly reworded thanks
from Robert Jasiek).

Assume a 19x19 no-handicap game played by perfect players with
New-Zealand rules with komi k. The fair komi k is defined as the integer
value which guarantees a draw (this is more fair than a non-integer
value hich guarantees a win by one of the players).  k exists because
with New Zealand rules the game is finite.  It is not possible to win
by an infinite amount of points, so k is bounded therefore k exists.

Now give the choice to black to either play the first move, or pass
and receive x extra points, x constrained to be an integer.  Let m be
the smallest value of x that black will accept to pass instead of
playing, and still be sure of getting a draw. m exists because the
game is finite, and black being perfect can determine m exactly.

m is my definition of the value of the first move. I am not attempting
to define the value of subsequent moves, and not assuming that these
values decrease constantly. I am only interested in the relation
between m and k.

If black passes, black has m points, white has k points, white to
play. White is now in exactly the same position that black was at
initially, so white playing perfectly for maximum score will also
get a draw. The player next to move on the empty board, who can
get a draw but not win, has a cash deficit of k points in the
first case (black to play) and m-k points in the other (black
passed and white to play).  So k = m-k or m = 2*k.

Jean-loup
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://computer-go.org/pipermail/computer-go/attachments/20100406/eda03489/attachment.html>
```