March 2008 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Sat Mar 1 06:03:42 PDT 2008
Ending: Mon Mar 31 16:28:42 PDT 2008
Messages: 329

• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   Gunnar Farnebäck
• [computer-go] Almost whole board seki   Gunnar Farnebäck
• [computer-go] 9x9   Gunnar Farnebäck
• [computer-go] State of the art of pattern matching   Gunnar Farnebäck
• [computer-go] Way MC plays   Jacques Basaldúa
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   Jacques Basaldúa
• [computer-go] State of the art of pattern matching (Oops)   Jacques Basaldúa
• [computer-go] State of the art of pattern matching   Jacques Basaldúa
• [computer-go] State of the art of pattern matching   Jacques Basaldúa
• [computer-go] State of the art of pattern matching   Jacques Basaldúa
• [computer-go] State of the art of pattern matching   Jacques Basaldúa
• [computer-go] Lockless hash table and other parallel search ideas   Rémi Coulom
• [computer-go] Lockless hash table and other parallel search ideas   Rémi Coulom
• [computer-go] Lockless hash table and other parallel search ideas   Rémi Coulom
• [computer-go] State of the art of pattern matching   Santiago Basaldúa
• [computer-go] Re: komi argument = silly   Alain Baeckeroot
• [computer-go] Hybrid theory   Alain Baeckeroot
• [computer-go] Re: computer-go Digest, Vol 43, Issue 8   Petr Baudis
• [jokahn@phare.normalesup.org: Re: [computer-go] Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   Petr Baudis
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   Petr Baudis
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   Petr Baudis
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   Petr Baudis
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   Petr Baudis
• [computer-go] Re: komi argument = silly   Petr Baudis
• [computer-go] Re: komi argument = silly   Petr Baudis
• [computer-go] Re: komi argument = silly   Petr Baudis
• [computer-go] Making playouts heavier   Petr Baudis
• [computer-go] Automated genetic parameters tuning   Petr Baudis
• [computer-go] CGOS client   Petr Baudis
• [computer-go] CGOS client   Petr Baudis
• [computer-go] CGOS client   Petr Baudis
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   Petr Baudis
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Petr Baudis
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Petr Baudis
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Petr Baudis
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Petr Baudis
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Petr Baudis
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Petr Baudis
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Petr Baudis
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Petr Baudis
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Petr Baudis
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Petr Baudis
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Petr Baudis
• [computer-go] MoGo/professional challenge   Petr Baudis
• [computer-go] MoGo/professional challenge   Petr Baudis
• [computer-go] MoGo/professional challenge   Petr Baudis
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Petr Baudis
• [computer-go] Ing Challenge   Petr Baudis
• [computer-go] State of the art of pattern matching   Petr Baudis
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   Christoph Birk
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   Christoph Birk
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   Christoph Birk
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   Christoph Birk
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   Christoph Birk
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   Christoph Birk
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   Christoph Birk
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   Christoph Birk
• [computer-go] Floating komi   Christoph Birk
• [computer-go] Floating komi   Christoph Birk
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   Christoph Birk
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   Christoph Birk
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   Christoph Birk
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   Christoph Birk
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Christoph Birk
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Christoph Birk
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Christoph Birk
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Christoph Birk
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Christoph Birk
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Christoph Birk
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Christoph Birk
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Christoph Birk
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Christoph Birk
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Christoph Birk
• [computer-go] 9x9 CGOS   Christoph Birk
• [computer-go] 9x9   Christoph Birk
• [computer-go] Ing Challenge   Christoph Birk
• [computer-go] State of the art of pattern matching   Christoph Birk
• [computer-go] State of the art of pattern matching   Christoph Birk
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   Mark Boon
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   Mark Boon
• [computer-go] 9x9   Mark Boon
• [computer-go] State of the art of pattern matching   Mark Boon
• [computer-go] CGOS?   Mark Boon
• [computer-go] CGOS?   Mark Boon
• [computer-go] State of the art of pattern matching   Mark Boon
• [computer-go] CGOS?   Mark Boon
• [computer-go] State of the art of pattern matching   Mark Boon
• [computer-go] State of the art of pattern matching   Mark Boon
• [computer-go] State of the art of pattern matching   Mark Boon
• [computer-go] State of the art of pattern matching   Mark Boon
• [computer-go] State of the art of pattern matching   Mark Boon
• [computer-go] State of the art of pattern matching   Mark Boon
• [computer-go] Life and Death   Tom Cooper
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   Don Dailey
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   Don Dailey
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   Don Dailey
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] Floating komi   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] Floating komi   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] Floating komi   Don Dailey
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] Floating komi   Don Dailey
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   Don Dailey
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   Don Dailey
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] Re: komi argument = silly   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] Re: komi argument = silly   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] Re: komi argument = silly   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] CGOS client   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] CGOS client   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] CGOS client   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] CGOS GTP client   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] CGOS GTP client   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] Computer Go event in European Go Congress, Sweden   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] MoGo/professional challenge   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] MoGo/professional challenge   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] MoGo/professional challenge   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] Lockless hash table and other parallel search ideas   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] Lockless hash table and other parallel search ideas   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] 9x9 CGOS   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] 9x9   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] 9x9   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] State of the art of pattern matching   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] CGOS?   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] CGOS?   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] State of the art of pattern matching   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] CGOS?   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] State of the art of pattern matching   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] State of the art of pattern matching   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] State of the art of pattern matching   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] State of the art of pattern matching   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] State of the art of pattern matching   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] State of the art of pattern matching   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] State of the art of pattern matching   Don Dailey
• [computer-go] there may be life left in traditional programs yet   Evan Daniel
• [computer-go] Hybrid theory   David Doshay
• [computer-go] Computer Go event in European Go Congress, Sweden   David Doshay
• [computer-go] Computer Go tournament at US Go Congress   David Doshay
• [computer-go] Prize money for computer tournament at US Go Congress   David Doshay
• [computer-go] State of the art of pattern matching   David Doshay
• [computer-go] Money for computer Go (was: Ing Challenge)   David Doshay
• [computer-go] Computer Go tournament at US Go Congress   Peter Drake
• [computer-go] Computer Go tournament at US Go Congress   Peter Drake
• [computer-go] Computer Go tournament at US Go Congress   Peter Drake
• [computer-go] solving the nakade problem   Ivan Dubois
• [computer-go] solving the nakade problem   Ivan Dubois
• [computer-go] Re: komi argument = silly   Dave Dyer
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   Florian Erhardt
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Tim Foden
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Tim Foden
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Tim Foden
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   David Fotland
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   David Fotland
• [computer-go] Computer Go tournament at US Go Congress   David Fotland
• [computer-go] Computer Go tournament at US Go Congress   David Fotland
• [computer-go] 9x9   David Fotland
• [computer-go] 9x9   David Fotland
• [computer-go] Ing Challenge   David Fotland
• [computer-go] Life and Death   David Fotland
• [computer-go] Life and Death   David Fotland
• [computer-go] Ing Challenge   David Fotland
• [computer-go] MoGo/professional challenge   Sylvain Gelly
• [computer-go] Collection of games for train? (jgogears)   D Gilder
• [computer-go] Perl Pattern Matching Go Program   D Gilder
• [computer-go] CGOS client   Jason House
• [computer-go] CGOS client   Jason House
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Jason House
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Jason House
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Jason House
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Jason House
• [computer-go] CGOS GTP client   Jason House
• [computer-go] CGOS GTP client   Jason House
• [computer-go] CGOS GTP client   Jason House
• [computer-go] CGOS GTP client   Jason House
• [computer-go] More on the Computer Go event in Sweden   Jason House
• [computer-go] Yet another question on uct and rave   Jason House
• [computer-go] Yet another question on uct and rave   Jason House
• [computer-go] MoGo/professional challenge   Robert Jasiek
• [computer-go] MoGo/professional challenge   Robert Jasiek
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   Jonas Kahn
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   Jonas Kahn
• [computer-go] Tactical information within simulations   Jonas Kahn
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   Jonas Kahn
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   Jonas Kahn
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   Jonas Kahn
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   Jonas Kahn
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Jonas Kahn
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Jonas Kahn
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   Hideki Kato
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   Hideki Kato
• [computer-go] Floating komi   Hideki Kato
• [computer-go] Floating komi   Hideki Kato
• [computer-go] 9x9 challenge   Hideki Kato
• [computer-go] Life and Death   Hideki Kato
• [computer-go] Ing Challenge   Hideki Kato
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   A van Kessel
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   Heikki Levanto
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Heikki Levanto
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   Weston Markham
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   Weston Markham
• [computer-go] Ing Challenge   Masahiro Okasaki
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   Gian-Carlo Pascutto
• [computer-go] Computer Go event in European Go Congress, Sweden   Gian-Carlo Pascutto
• [computer-go] Yet another question on uct and rave   Gian-Carlo Pascutto
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   Magnus Persson
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   Magnus Persson
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   Magnus Persson
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   Magnus Persson
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   Magnus Persson
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   Magnus Persson
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   Magnus Persson
• [computer-go] Life and Death   Magnus Persson
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Magnus Persson
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Magnus Persson
• [computer-go] solving the nakade problem   Magnus Persson
• [computer-go] Optimal explore rates for plain UCT   Magnus Persson
• [computer-go] CGOS client   Moi de Quoi
• [computer-go] CGOS client   Moi de Quoi
• [computer-go] State of the art of pattern matching   Moi de Quoi
• [computer-go] Yet another question on uct and rave   Jaonary Rabarisoa
• [computer-go] Yet another question on uct and rave   Jaonary Rabarisoa
• [computer-go] Yet another question on uct and rave   Jaonary Rabarisoa
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   Olivier Teytaud
• [computer-go] MoGo/professional challenge   Olivier Teytaud
• [computer-go] MoGo/professional challenge   Olivier Teytaud
• [computer-go] MoGo/professional challenge   Olivier Teytaud
• [computer-go] MoGo/professional challenge   Olivier Teytaud
• [computer-go] MoGo/professional challenge   Olivier Teytaud
• [computer-go] MoGo/professional challenge   Olivier Teytaud
• [computer-go] MoGo/professional challenge   Olivier Teytaud
• [computer-go] MoGo/professional challenge   Olivier Teytaud
• [computer-go] MoGo/professional challenge   Olivier Teytaud
• [computer-go] Lockless hash table and other parallel search ideas   Olivier Teytaud
• [computer-go] 9x9   Olivier Teytaud
• [computer-go] 9x9   Olivier Teytaud
• [computer-go] MoGo/Taranu challenge in Paris   Olivier Teytaud
• [computer-go] MoGo/Taranu challenge in Paris   Olivier Teytaud
• [computer-go] March KGS bot tournament   Nick Wedd
• [computer-go] Congratulations to Crazy Stone ..   Nick Wedd
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   Nick Wedd
• [computer-go] Computer Go event in European Go Congress, Sweden   Nick Wedd
• [computer-go] More on the Computer Go event in Sweden   Nick Wedd
• [computer-go] MoGo/professional challenge   Nick Wedd
• [computer-go] MoGo/professional challenge   Nick Wedd
• [computer-go] 9x9   Nick Wedd
• [computer-go] MoGo/Taranu challenge in Paris   Nick Wedd
• [computer-go] March KGS bot tournament: small boards, fast   Nick Wedd
• [computer-go] April KGS bot tournament: small boards, fast   Nick Wedd
• [computer-go] Yet another question on uct and rave   Erik van der Werf
• [computer-go] Yet another question on uct and rave   Erik van der Werf
• [computer-go] Yet another question on uct and rave   Erik van der Werf
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   Michael Williams
• [computer-go] Computer Go tournament at US Go Congress   Michael Williams
• [computer-go] Computer Go tournament at US Go Congress   Michael Williams
• [computer-go] Playout policies   Michael Williams
• [computer-go] Floating komi   Raymond Wold
• [computer-go] Re: komi argument = silly   Thomas Wolf
• [jokahn@phare.normalesup.org: Re: [computer-go] Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   Matthew Woodcraft
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   Matthew Woodcraft
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   Matthew Woodcraft
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   Matthew Woodcraft
• [computer-go] Floating komi   Matthew Woodcraft
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   Matthew Woodcraft
• [computer-go] Life and Death   Matthew Woodcraft
• [computer-go] Life and Death   Matthew Woodcraft
• [computer-go] MoGo/professional challenge   Hiroshi Yamashita
• [computer-go] MoGo/professional challenge   Hiroshi Yamashita
• [computer-go] Collection of games for train? (jgogears)   Stuart A. Yeates
• [computer-go] State of the art of pattern matching   Stuart A. Yeates
• [computer-go] State of the art of pattern matching   Stuart A. Yeates
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   compgo123 at aol.com
• [computer-go] Automated genetic parameters tuning   dhillismail at netscape.net
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   ivan dubois
• [computer-go] Tactical information within simulations   ivan dubois
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   ivan dubois
• [computer-go] f(score) instead of sign(score)   jonas.kahn at math.u-psud.fr
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   jonas.kahn at math.u-psud.fr
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   jonas.kahn at math.u-psud.fr
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   terry mcintyre
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   terry mcintyre
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   terry mcintyre
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   terry mcintyre
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   terry mcintyre
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   terry mcintyre
• [computer-go] there may be life left in traditional programs yet   terry mcintyre
• [computer-go] 9x9   terry mcintyre
• [computer-go] 9x9 challenge   terry mcintyre
• [computer-go] Life and Death   terry mcintyre
• [computer-go] State of the art of pattern matching   terry mcintyre
• [computer-go] State of the art of pattern matching   terry mcintyre
• [computer-go] Life and Death   terry mcintyre
• [computer-go] Ing Challenge   terry mcintyre
• [computer-go] State of the art of pattern matching   terry mcintyre
• [computer-go] State of the art of pattern matching   terry mcintyre
• [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]   steve uurtamo
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   steve uurtamo
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   steve uurtamo
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   steve uurtamo
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   steve uurtamo
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   steve uurtamo
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   steve uurtamo
• [computer-go] Almost whole board seki   steve uurtamo
• [computer-go] Floating komi   steve uurtamo
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   steve uurtamo
• endgame (Was [computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?])   steve uurtamo
• [computer-go] 9x9   steve uurtamo

Last message date: Mon Mar 31 16:28:42 PDT 2008
Archived on: Mon Mar 31 16:28:54 PDT 2008

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...