[computer-go] MoGo/professional challenge
Don Dailey
drdailey at cox.net
Fri Mar 21 14:38:06 PDT 2008
Olivier Teytaud wrote:
>> Would you guess that mogo is 2 or 3 ranks stronger at 19x19 with all
>> this hardware?
>
> I just claim that mpi-mogo wins with very high probability against
> sequential-mogo in 19x19. But I'm afraid that the improvement is
> disappointing against humans.
Hopefully it is still much stronger in reality. But I think your
opponent in this case is too strong to really get much of a sense of
what is happening.
If Mogo really isn't improving against humans but is improving against
other Mogo's and this is a substantial effect, it means something is
wrong with the algorithm - I would guess this would indicate that Mogo
is too selective.
I feel your pain - there is no easy way to test any of this without more
power yet. If you need a network of workstations to test a single
processor program, then you need a several networks of workstations to
test a single network of workstations!
- Don
>
> I hope better improvements are possible thanks to the fact that
> parallelization makes heavier playouts computationnally less expensive
> - communication and concurrency for memory access becomes negligible
> with heavy playouts.
>
> _______________________________________________
> computer-go mailing list
> computer-go at computer-go.org
> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
>
More information about the computer-go
mailing list