[computer-go] Re: Should 9x9 komi be 8.0 ?]
terry mcintyre
terrymcintyre at yahoo.com
Tue Mar 4 09:34:21 PST 2008
Knowing that most current programs have a weakness
with regard to nakade, then any program which believes
it is behind ought to try and exploit such weaknesses,
no?
--- Magnus Persson <magnus.persson at phmp.se> wrote:
> Quoting Christoph Birk <birk at ociw.edu>:
>
> > On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Don Dailey wrote:
> >> I really believe the source of peoples confusion
> on this is believing
> >> that the program starts playing "ugly random"
> moves as soon as it is
> >> down a little. But in fact, when it gets into
> "ugly" mode it is
> >> because the score is very close to 0.0 or in
> some programs like Lazarus
> >> -1.0
> >
> > I thinks it's the source of your confusion. A MC
> program makes
> > "silly" moves when it thinks it will definitely
> lose; but it
> > does so even if the margin of loss is only 0.5
> pts.
>
> But here you are missing the point that close to 0%
> winning
> probability means that it cannot win against random
> play. The opponent
> could lose only by killing his own groups.
>
> -Magnus
> _______________________________________________
> computer-go mailing list
> computer-go at computer-go.org
>
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
>
Terry McIntyre <terrymcintyre at yahoo.com>
Wherever is found what is called a paternal government, there is found state education. It has been discovered that the best way to insure implicit obedience is to commence tyranny in the nursery.
Benjamin Disraeli, Speech in the House of Commons [June 15, 1874]
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
More information about the computer-go
mailing list