[computer-go] 19x19 Study

Don Dailey drdailey at cox.net
Thu Jan 31 06:28:15 PST 2008


We want a version simply for the study - it may not make a performance
difference and will probably hurt the performance for a given time
level,   so I would suggest it not to be the primary version. 

- Don


Sylvain Gelly wrote:
> No problem for me. I did not want to multiply the number of versions
> not to confuse people. With the double version, don't forget it will
> increase the memory footprint for a given number of nodes.
>
> Sylvain
>
> 2008/1/30, Olivier Teytaud <Olivier.Teytaud at lri.fr
> <mailto:Olivier.Teytaud at lri.fr>>:
>
>     I can provide a new release with double instead of float.
>     (unless the other mogo-people reading this mailing-list do not
>     agree for
>     this; Sylvain, no problem for you ?).
>
>     > I don't know exactly when it begins to do bad moves. However, I
>     know that
>     > after several hours, the estimated winning rate converges to 1
>     or 0, with
>     > crazy principal variations, and the cause is low resolution of
>     single
>     > floats. In this study, it should no be a big factor of
>     unscalability given
>     > the number of simulations.
>     _______________________________________________
>     computer-go mailing list
>     computer-go at computer-go.org <mailto:computer-go at computer-go.org>
>     http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> computer-go mailing list
> computer-go at computer-go.org
> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/


More information about the computer-go mailing list