[computer-go] Hydra theory (was Hybrid theory)
terry mcintyre
terrymcintyre at yahoo.com
Fri Feb 1 18:41:03 PST 2008
From: Don Dailey <drdailey at cox.net>
> But
take
care
-
it's
my
understanding
that
borda
relies
totally
on
> ranking
ALL
choices
and
that
to
work
correctly
every
agent
much
vote
on
> ALL
candidates,
ranking
them
from
best
to
worst.
> Voting
theory
is
like
hashing
or
building
random
number
generators.
> It's
really
easy
to
do
it
wrong
and
screw
it
up
and
think
you
did
it right.
Here's another approach: "Range Voting"
http://rangevoting.org/rangeVborda.html
The author of this particular page makes much of the pitfalls of strategic voting, which should not matter to a set of emotionally disinterested, independent agent routines. But range voting has one further advantage over borda voting: expressiveness. If an agent is given 99 votes to cast, the agent can say that A is a really fine move, worth 45 points; B and C and D are worth 15 points each, and I have no opinion on the remaining choices" -- or whatever reflects the state of the board as understood by this particular agent. This expressiveness may help or hinder; hard to say.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
More information about the computer-go
mailing list