[computer-go] ego110_allfirst on CGOS

[Don Dailey]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


steve uurtamo wrote:
>> Strangely enough, it now appears that hb-amaf-1k-v2 is significantly
>> stronger than genAnchor-1k, defeating it 9 out of 9 times.  I still have
>> to wonder what the cause of the strength difference is.
>
> now is the time to just let it run for a few weeks and check on the
> stats later.


I perceive that you are prophet.  The gap between the two programs are
very small now,  just 33 ELO.    There is very little empirical evidence
of a strength advantage.    But I admit that hb-amaf-1k-v2 hit the
ground running!

I would say now that our implementations are very similar.

- - Don

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHAR+aDsOllbwnSikRAtb+AKDO3nSNrW00Ff643M8fL3EDDNI68gCbBa1q
51dtYzX0xrCoDHNLyfZThVc=
=3gTc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----