[computer-go] Language
Nick Apperson
apperson at gmail.com
Tue Nov 13 13:18:17 PST 2007
Yeah,
I've only dabbled in Lisp, but it seems like a great language to me. It
is on my list of languages to learn. I couldn't agree with you more about
Java and C# being about prohibition. With the next generation of C++ with
variadic templates I think C++ may overtake Lisp for metaprogramming, but I
don't know enough to really make that claim. I stray from Lisp mainly
because it isn't used as much as C++. But I do respect those that use it.
- Nick
On Nov 13, 2007 3:10 PM, Stefan Nobis <stefan-ml at snobis.de> wrote:
> "Nick Apperson" <apperson at gmail.com> writes:
>
> > And I don't htink I missed the point about productivity. I've heard
> > that argument time and again. That is fine. I personally find that
> > with the STL in C++ and with the ability to write my own templates,
> > I can write algorithms in fewer lines of code that in Java.
>
> Wrong comparisson: I loathe Java. Compare to something like Common
> Lisp (or some Scheme like PLT Scheme or Haskell or Erlang -- hey, here
> are quite some guys trying to distribute the go engine over a cluster:
> for this Erlang seems to be a really good choice).
>
> C# and Java are all about rules and prohibition. Other languages like
> Common Lisp are like C and C++ more about freedom and flexibility.
>
> --
> Until the next mail...,
> Stefan.
> _______________________________________________
> computer-go mailing list
> computer-go at computer-go.org
> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://computer-go.org/pipermail/computer-go/attachments/20071113/f541fb9e/attachment.htm
More information about the computer-go
mailing list