[computer-go] KO in Hashtable-UCT?
Heikki Levanto
heikki at lsd.dk
Wed May 23 03:16:11 PDT 2007
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 06:47:58AM -0300, Eduardo Sabbatella wrote:
> In my experience adding a captured stoned limit per
> game biases the results. strongly.
In which direction?
> The limit was a constant number. Perhaps it could be
> good to define it as a function of current move
> number.
I don't make any tests for the first 20 moves. Thereafter, I resign if
- I have no stones left on board
- I have less than half the number of stones my opponent has
I also pass if my opponent has no stones left on board.
I should do these in the MC simulations too, but so far I have been
using Lew's libego unmodified.
- Heikki
--
Heikki Levanto "In Murphy We Turst" heikki (at) lsd (dot) dk
More information about the computer-go
mailing list