[computer-go] ICGA 2007 MoGo-Steenvreter

[Łukasz Lew]

This is my analysis. It may be flawed but I hope it has some value.

It would be very interesting to see what mogo "thinks" on those variations.

Best Regards,
Lukasz


On 6/14/07, Sylvain Gelly <sylvain.gelly at m4x.org> wrote:
> Hello Sanghyeon, thank you for your comments.
>
> > > After white (mogo) H2, MoGo was estimating 74%, and expecting:
> > > H2 G1 H3 B1 A1 B3 H1 F8 B5 H4
> > This is far too optimistic. Why would black play H2? :-)
> Sorry, white played H2. The sequence I gave starts with white move :).
> Black was expecting to play G1 :).
>
> > > Black played H3, and estimation increased to 81%, white B3 and expecting:
> > > B3 B1 A1 B4 C5 C4 A3 C6 B6 B5
> > After B3 B1 A1, black G1 and then B1 F1 D1 B4 and white is dead.
> Ok thanks. So good white actually played G1 instead of A1 after black B1 then.
>
>
> > > Actually during pondering MoGo realized that it was lost then, because
> > > black played the expected move (B1), but the estimation was then <
> > > 50%.
> > MoGo realized too. Actually G1 is an interesting move. After white 48,
> > all groups on the board is alive and white actually wins by my counting.
> > So I think that white 50 is a losing move.
>
> Oh, so contrary to what I believed, you say (if I understand you
> correctly) that the mistake was done in the upper left group and not
> in the bottom center group?
>
>
> Thank you,
> Sylvain
> _______________________________________________
> computer-go mailing list
> computer-go at computer-go.org
> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: tour_169-round_9-game_2-analysis.sgf
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 3865 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://computer-go.org/pipermail/computer-go/attachments/20070615/1b740084/tour_169-round_9-game_2-analysis.obj