[computer-go] Explanation to MoGo paper wanted.

[Don Dailey]

On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 19:23 -0400, Don Dailey wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 01:09 +0200, Magnus Persson wrote:
> > Just to disturb the vision a strong go program without hardwired go 
> > knowledge I
> > currently think that there are some really important things in Go that
> > are
> > really hard or even impossible to learn with for examples patterns.
> > The ideal
> > program would need to learn procedural skills (algorithms).
> 
> I'm not saying a program can be as good without hardwired knowledge, I'm
> just saying it would be a cool thing!    

And even if you could, it would still require hard coded meta-skills -
skills programmed explicitly to enable it to LEARN or discover what it
needed.   So even if it wasn't direct go knowledge it would be indirect
go knowledge.

Kind of like, give a man a fish or teach him to fish.

- Don




> - Don
> 
> 
> 
> 
>