[computer-go] an idea for a new measure of a computer go program's
rank.
dave.devos at planet.nl
dave.devos at planet.nl
Sun Jan 21 03:43:29 PST 2007
----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
Van: Ray Tayek <rtayek at ca.rr.com>
Datum: zondag, januari 21, 2007 4:18 am
Onderwerp: Re: [computer-go] an idea for a new measure of a computer go
program's rank.
>
> also i suspect that at least 33% of the moves (at my 1-dan level)
> are
> wrong (what you might call in chess a "blunder"?).
>
> what do other people of different strengths think about this 33%?
>
I don't know the percentage of blunders. It also depends on what you
call a blunder. Is a 1 point mistake a blunder?
But on average it would seem that a player loses about 13 points per
game per grade separation from perfect play (11d?), implied by the
definition of grade difference in relation to compensation by handicap
stones. I don't know what the distribution of these mistakes related
to their size would be (it would be interesting to find out), but I
suspect the small mistakes would be more numerous.
For a 1d this would imply a loss of about 130 points over the course
of about 130 moves played by him in a game. So on average he loses 1
point per move. I would guess that a handful of mistakes would be big,
but most moves lose just a little bit or nothing at all.
Dave
More information about the computer-go
mailing list