[computer-go] Big board

[Chris Fant]

That is what I initially thought, but when I reread "renormalize it
repeatedly", I figured you must not mean that because that would just
give you a single pixel after N iterations.


On 2/20/07, David Doshay <ddoshay at mac.com> wrote:
> Thanks for doing this so quickly!
>
> But it was not what I was trying to ask for. The renormalization I was
> suggesting would make each successive lattice smaller by a factor of
> 3 in each direction at each step.
>
> Cheers,
> David
>
>
>
> On 20, Feb 2007, at 8:29 PM, Chris Fant wrote:
>
> >> Is there any chance you would take the whole lattice and
> >> renormalize it
> >> repeatedly this way?
> >
> > I have used a 5-block shape like a cross.
> >
> > http://fantius.com/0.bmp   (the initial image)
> > http://fantius.com/1.bmp
> > http://fantius.com/2.bmp
> > http://fantius.com/3.bmp
> > http://fantius.com/4.bmp
> > http://fantius.com/5.bmp
> > http://fantius.com/6.bmp
> > _______________________________________________
> > computer-go mailing list
> > computer-go at computer-go.org
> > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
>
> _______________________________________________
> computer-go mailing list
> computer-go at computer-go.org
> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
>