[computer-go] Monte-Carlo Go Misnomer?

[Chris Fant]

> In our work on MoGo we found that there could be a decrease of the
> strength of the MC/UCT program while using a stronger simulation
> policy. It is why in MoGo it is more the "sequence idea", than the
> "strength idea". Our best simulation policy is quite weak compared to
> others we tested.

Could you elaborate on the "sequence idea"?  Or point me to somewhere
where you have already done so?