[computer-go] The dominance of search (Suzie v. GnuGo)
Chrilly
c.donninger at wavenet.at
Sat Apr 7 11:43:12 PDT 2007
>
> I don't understand your question. I don't claim non-determinism
> helps with alpha beta and I'm not recommending a fuzzy evaluation
> function, I'm just saying it still works. A deeper search will
> produce better moves in general.
>
One has the randomness anyway. A heuristic evalution can be considered as
the sum of a systematic term which is an estimator of the "true" evaluation
and an error term (and a bias).
One consequence of this model is, that the shape of the search tree has a
significant influence on the evaluation. The programm will favour variations
where it has a lot of good moves and the opponent has only a few. Because
the more (good) moves the program has, the higher is the expected value of
the error terms. The programm has more tickets in the error-term lottery.
I have noticed this effect constantly. E.g. if one extends captures, the
programm tends to favour lines with captures, if one extends checks
stronger, the program likes to check...
Chrilly
More information about the computer-go
mailing list