[computer-go] MoGo
Nick Wedd
nick at maproom.co.uk
Thu Apr 5 06:42:37 PDT 2007
In message <1175779024.7429.2150.camel at localhost.localdomain>, Don
Dailey <drd at mit.edu> writes
>On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 10:49 +0100, Jacques Basaldúa wrote:
>> But when the
>> program counts, surprise!, it wins by 0.5 points Chinese.
>> The users were thinking Japanese even if they accepted
>> Chinese rules. In fact, they did not have the choice.
>> They get the impression the game was stolen by
>> "technicalities" after they saw the engine blunder many
>> times.
>
>How does Japanese make any difference? I would think that
>a Japanese rule player would appreciate UCT style of play
>more than Chinese players?
People are aware that Japanese and Chinese scoring can sometimes differ
by a point. So when a player loses to a program by half a point,
he can try claiming that he would have won if the other scoring method
had been used.
I like to think that MoGo deliberately beats such people by half a
point, so as to annoy them more :-)
Nick
--
Nick Wedd nick at maproom.co.uk
More information about the computer-go
mailing list