[computer-go] cgos komi (was: Odd experimental results)
David Doshay
ddoshay at mac.com
Tue Sep 26 21:12:21 PDT 2006
These numbers make me think that setting komi to
6.5 for the next N00,000 games should be tried.
Cheers,
David
On 28, Aug 2006, at 8:48 PM, Don Dailey wrote:
> I did a little analysis from all the CGOS games.
>
> I considered all the games between pairs of players of roughly equal
> strength and made a table.
>
> komi on CGOS is 7.5
>
> RANGE GAMES BLACK PERC WHITE PERC
> 600 - 799 17546 41.47 % 58.53 %
> 800 - 999 10883 39.36 % 60.64 %
> 1000 - 1199 1515 43.37 % 56.63 %
> 1200 - 1399 5542 43.79 % 56.21 %
> 1400 - 1599 9774 48.23 % 51.77 %
> 1600 - 1799 14706 49.37 % 50.63 %
>
> In my table, I only consider games where BOTH players are in the same
> 200 point range and both players are well established.
>
>
> A similar table considering only opponents within 100 ELO of each
> other:
>
>
> RANGE GAMES BLACK PERC WHITE PERC
> 1000 - 1099 803 41.84 % 58.16 %
> 1100 - 1199 55 43.64 % 56.36 %
> 1200 - 1299 2792 43.80 % 56.20 %
> 1300 - 1399 338 47.63 % 52.37 %
> 1400 - 1499 289 46.02 % 53.98 %
> 1500 - 1599 5984 48.85 % 51.15 %
> 1600 - 1699 1962 47.50 % 52.50 %
> 1700 - 1799 6044 50.15 % 49.85 %
> 1800 - 1899 863 46.93 % 53.07 %
>
> It appears that with 7.5 komi, white has an advantage for most of
> these
> brackets of players except the 1700-1799 players.
>
> If one of the players who frequently plays on CGOS has a color bias or
> bug, that could upset these statistics.
>
> The table implies a trend for stronger players to require higher
> komi's
> and also that 7.5 komi is pretty close. This proves nothing
> conclusively of course. These are computers and not humans. The
> really
> strong players, between 1800 and 1899 appear to need LESS komi, but
> there are only 863 games to sample from there.
More information about the computer-go
mailing list