[computer-go] Anchor player
Łukasz Lew
lukasz.lew at gmail.com
Tue Sep 26 13:23:59 PDT 2006
Depth 2, described earlier seems to be a good candidate.
Lukasz Lew
On 9/26/06, Don Dailey <drd at mit.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 14:03 -0400, House, Jason J. wrote:
> > How well does a monte carlo bot with a fixed number of simulations fit
> > your profile? It fits everything except maybe requirement #6
> > (resources). It's also has the added benefit of being extremely simple
> > to code and for others to understand.
>
> It fits very closely. If it's limited to about 10,000 simulations, it
> doesn't take much resources but it's a bit on the weak side.
>
> There are a few enhancements that can be done to salvage the strength
> but they must be simple and well defined (and documented) if we want
> something that fits all the criteria I mentioned.
>
> I think it's ideal if the algorithm is documented to the extent that
> equivalent clones can be implemented and especially if the description
> can remain quite simple. I wouldn't want this to become a complex
> engineering project.
>
> - Don
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> computer-go mailing list
> computer-go at computer-go.org
> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
>
More information about the computer-go
mailing list