[computer-go] A new pairing system idea for CGOS
Don Dailey
drd at mit.edu
Sun Oct 8 16:59:00 PDT 2006
On Sat, 2006-10-07 at 00:13 -0500, Matt Gokey wrote:
> Don Dailey wrote:
>
> > Paring in rounds is good for the first goal and is what I plan to do.
> I know, I was just being complete in repeating this decision...
>
> > Your basic idea is sound - but it's all in the formula for point 2. I
> > would not base it on the rating, I would base it on the RANKING
> Why the ranking over the rating? Ranking eliminates the real strength
> differences. A cluster of 3 players near 1700 and then one at 1300
> looks much different than rank 1, 2, 3, 4.
Because a cluster of 2 or 3 bots near 2100, all of them Mogo versions,
would mean all or mostly mogo vs mogo. One of the design goals of CGOS
is variety. I don't want pairing based on rating pockets.
- Don
> Matt
> _______________________________________________
> computer-go mailing list
> computer-go at computer-go.org
> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
More information about the computer-go
mailing list