[computer-go] UCT

Peter Drake drake at lclark.edu
Fri Nov 3 09:15:20 PST 2006


On Nov 3, 2006, at 8:10 AM, Rémi Coulom wrote:

> You can try multiplying uncertainty by a well-chosen constant  
> value. This way, you can tune how selective your search is. I found  
> that using a constant < 1 improves the search on 9x9 for Crazy  
> Stone (I use 1/sqrt(10), if I recall correctly). I wonder what is  
> the experience of other UCT programmers, by the way.

Whee, parameter tweaking!  :-)

Do you have some reason for choosing this value, or did it just work  
well in practice?

>> Also, are people pruning any move for which (average +  
>> uncertainty) is less than the (average - uncertainty) of some  
>> other move?
> I am not sure what you mean. In UCT, you only search the move that  
> has the highest average + uncertainty, and you don't search any  
> other at all.

By "prune" I mean "remove from the stored tree", making the memory  
used on that branch available for something else.

Peter Drake
Assistant Professor of Computer Science
Lewis & Clark College
http://www.lclark.edu/~drake/




More information about the computer-go mailing list