[computer-go] Interesting problem
alain Baeckeroot
alain.baeckeroot at laposte.net
Thu Dec 28 14:40:52 PST 2006
Le jeudi 28 décembre 2006 18:47, Don Dailey a écrit :
> Yes,
>
> Someone mentioned random as being infinitely weak but there is no
> such thing. Resigning on the first move is as weak as you can
> get.
>
> The random player isn't really random, it doesn't fill it's eyes.
> There are strategies to play MUCH worse than random as you
> point out.
Ok maybe one can build worst than random program, they will converge faster
toward -infinity :)
>
> I don't believe the random player is particularly easy to take
> advantage of. Of course it's very easy to beat, but it has
> no special "quirks" compared to more deterministic algorithms.
On CGOS 9X9 "GNUGo-1.2" is nearly 1000 ELO stronger than "Random",
and on kgs gnugo1pt2 is ranked 22k, this is incredibly weak.
10-games-beginner is stronger than this !
I think it would be totally useless to try to use such a randombot for
reference. The only use of random bot is for bug squashing in other engines,
and test for time limit.
Alain
More information about the computer-go
mailing list