[computer-go] Re: language choices

[Stefan Nobis]

Antoine de Maricourt <antoine.de-maricourt at m4x.org> writes:

> I can develop very quickly 'quick and dirty' code to test new ideas
> in C++, and recode it in a very clean / organized / modular / robust
> ... code later if needed. This ability is not coming from the
> programming langage itself...

I beg to differ. If you compare something like C, C++, Java, C# and
the like: Yes, then you are right. But there are languages like
Python, Ruby, Scheme, Smalltalk, especially Common Lisp and
more. These dynamic languages allow for a quite different working
style and you easily can experiment and at the same time get really
good, modular and robust code.

-- 
Until the next mail...,
Stefan.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://computer-go.org/pipermail/computer-go/attachments/20061206/f4d5bf2a/attachment.pgp